And as regards the questions of torture
Lin
referred I presume the
same par. of
sxisting
that dess.
instrations will
strat
7.0.
stand (as laid down in desp.
? Write to 7.0. making
woo/85
th
above proporals, sending copy of destiny?
inclos
munter and desp?
He will see fron munter
Thank that a
" that a different
on 20809/84 followed in
Course
in the Straits from what in
above suggested,
but pending,
Me
ling expected Extradition treaty with (lina, the above seems a
desirable
modus vivendi for Hongking]
(pas 297)
There is re Fresty Mtigation Latrasite di Chesin pem the Straits- E
Sie Gßes Voux préfores that extradition o persons who have not resided in Bresking for a certain period say 2 guars should be
the demand of the Vienoy f granted Province alleging that the person has committed an Extradition offence.
wittent any
a
andme
he would not
in support of the allegation- "extend this "simple extradition procesi» kerams who have resided for the fixed period geall hole the most windende megh whil keep out he does wat by whether he would empt such persons allgathe, from extradition or retain the swisting low as to them - As pistifier his startling preporal on the pounds that the interests of the Clong and of China requir that the atment facility should exist for extradition. from the key of Chinex criminals and that
Chinese testimony aving to the imperfections.
7. equirement of proof sufficient to portif à magistrate
a
the
Q
om dispond to
FE LEL
this
K
in Committing
an accused person for trial apponds 464
no real security against
the extradition.
musluk
persons while it pequently prevents the extradition
་
the guilty and creates such difficuther abmest to render the treaty
a
dead letter
A-F
I do not think that 4 M. But could entertain
or that Parliament would
howtoir mifertant it
auch a proposal
allows them to do so
eigh to Araghang the rid
z
Chinese criminals
and to China to prevent her criminals porn Cition,
it would be quite madmissible
Alhage in Breskung
to wasin
in the case.
othina the requirement
which is Enfreed by actysparliament
Cons
all centigis
retions
3
han Extradition Kenties
4-4
with whom we
Kay
can it h
admitted that magistrates who are entrusted with the duty on administering portice in the
Celny
ale
inexpate
a relitte judgment
Сама
o Kentang wakte forming
op
the andme in intradition
streme
Setting aside their this preferal it remanis 4h considered what âmendments of the misting
low are
required
I beleive that what has caused the greatest low is the difficulty in carrying and the existing
the Groves auf wheel is held, in accordance with the opinions the Lan Speirs, the impond au
final o leorsing the Magistrales decision and
thullers but potiff the Satisfying windern is defficient to justify
the extradition
ta
of the person whom he has committed to presin.
were placed is the same position and if the former as the Puritanostats and the former of a Celung ass placed under the Extradition hit 1070 the Pragistrates
in a litter position to form als Крейкой
on the windrace then the frot and be: (ceil would deal with the cases under a peater suse of
salesfecting Responsiblet aud
I think that for Russell has shown for cons
the who
are
and is a more
4
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.